There are so many reasons that people
choose to train their core; rehabilitation from back injury, stability, losing
body fat, vanity… yet there are so many theories and exercise suggestions on
what we do to get there… yet the common
crunch seems to retain a presence no matter where we look! A trim waistline has been proven to be a
popular thing! And lower backs seem to be the most popular injury of all… With
so much lack of success when it comes to the trim waist and strong back, why
are so many of us so willing to cling to the old ideas about training core and
not embrace the new??? Why won’t any of
us, despite our education and experience, let go of the crunch???
The core is made up of inner and outer
units; the inner units are made up of transverse abdominis, mutlifidus,
diaphragm and pelvic floor. These are
low intensity muscles that wrap around the spine to hug and support it. The inner units are also said to be the
anticipatory core; if one moves an arm or a leg, (when functioning well) these
muscles anticipate the movement and activate to serve as an anchor for the
trunk.
The outer units consist of the Lats,
Obliques, Recuts Abdominis, Erector Spinae, Glutes etc. and support the spine
when under load and during movement.
When these muscles are balanced and strong, the spine keeps its ideal
neutral state that promotes a healthy lower back and it offers a strong
postural center and postural control within ongoing movement patterns. The outer units are said to be part of the
‘reactive core’; when one goes to move arms or legs, these muscles switch on
after the inner core and decipher their activation level depending on the
direction of the movement (“Core Conversations:
The Anticipatory vs. Reactive Core” – Julie Wiebe).
When people think of losing body fat it is
often the waistline that becomes the greatest target. It is no secret; the key to a trim waistline
is diet… yet, there haven’t been more contraptions invented by home gym sellers
than that which has targeted the abdominals, and classes such as ‘ab blast’ and
‘abs plus’ and ‘toned tummies’ seem to remain on most Group Fitness timetables
despite industry trend changes and other programs fading in and out. Despite all the contrary information out
there, so many of us just won’t let go of the idea that 100 crunches a day is
the key to the flat, toned, strong stomach!
A recent study lead by Dr Jinger S.
Gottschall of Pennsylvania State University influenced the value I have placed
on crunches for strengthening and toning the abdominal area. In this study 20 participants including
instructors were wired up to an ENG machine to test the abdominal activation in
a Body Combat class. The muscles wired
up were the rectus abdominis and external obliques, which are the surface
abdominal muscles, used in crunches. Subjects
performed the moves performed in Body Combat release 51 and then performed
crunches to the same speed of the music and time of the moves in that
release. The results showed that certain
Body Combat moves such as jabs, front kicks, and high knees recorded a higher
level of abdominal activation compared to that of a crunch; a jab showed 1.62x
the amount of abdominal activation over 20 seconds compared to crunches
performed at the same speed for this duration and double front kicks showed
2.3x the amount of activation compared to that of a crunch! When the results were compared and
calculated, 1 Body Combat class equaled 1700 crunches!!! According to Bryce Hastings (Technical Consultant
for Les Mills International) Body Combat is a form of Reactive Core training;
this form of training exploits the body’s natural muscle wiring and natural
reflexes through repetitive movements.
The reactive core is also said to be more useful when the body is under
load.
In the late 1990’s when Pilates swept the
nation, the inner unit of abdominals became the focus and the answer to all lower
back pain. The solution rested in the
idea of ‘hollowing’ (“Applied Core
Science” – Bryce Hastings Technical consultant for Les Mills International). Drawing in the abdomen and flattening the
spine could successfully activate the inner unit with the main focus being
transverse abdominis and multifidus.
This line of thought successfully healed many lower back issues when it
came to day-to-day tasks and inactive lifestyles. Unfortunately, these muscles only offer
support when the spine is in gentle postures.
Transverse abdominis and multifidus are small muscles that operate at a
low intensity.
Canadian Bio-Mechanics expert Stuart McGill
challenged the idea of hollowing; hollowing changed the length of abdominal
muscles such as rectus abdominis and external obliques so they ‘buckled’ when
hollowed and could no longer support the spine at full potential. McGill suggested the idea of ‘bracing the
abdominals’ rather than hollowing; that way the spine remained neutral and the
muscles could remain at normal length so that they could support the spine from
the outer unit. It was also McGill that recommended
hovers and planks as key exercises to strengthening abdominal muscles as they
allowed the spine to remain neutral and the external abdominal muscles to support
the spine at normal length. Dr. Jinger S. Gottschall of Pennsylvania State
University also conducted a study where 10 participants were wired up to an ENG
machine and the amount of abdominal activity was compared between integrated
exercises such as a hover compared to isolation exercises such as a
crunch. Integrated exercises showed more
muscle activity compared to isolation.
There has been so much more research done
since the common crunch; yet many of us cling to it as though it is the be all
and end all of abdominal exercises. We
crunch in hope of strength, a trimmed waistline, and that stronger back so that
pain won’t hinder us! Yet there are so many things that have been proven to work
better than the common crunch - to equal the reactive core activation shown in
a Body Combat class, you would have to complete 1700 crunches! Integrated exercises such as a hover have
measured more abdominal activity compared to the isolated crunch and have been
known to bring the body back to its preferred neutral spine position. Yet, even considering all these facts the core/stretch
training area of any gym the most entertaining of all mainly due to it basically representing misinformation on display; crunches
performed at back breaking speeds, crunches performed with more neck activation
than abs, spines being forced into distorted positions and all this shows is ignorance of what the core is and does! When our core is strong, our whole body is strong... yet so many of us are willing to abuse our bodies by distorting our postures to enhance the burn we feel from particular crunch type exercises that serve no functional purpose. Why is the ‘burn’ always favoured above research and education???
No comments:
Post a Comment